How Tim Apple Helped Me Make Sense of the Financial Times

I was recently reading the Financial Times and came across an article about Tim Apple. I was struck by how his story helped me make sense of the paper’s coverage of the stock market.

Checkout this video:


I have been an avid reader of the Financial Times for many years. I remember buying my first copy when I was living in London and working as an intern at a bank. I would read it on the train to work, and then spend my lunch break discussing the latest news with my colleagues. But a few years ago, I stopped reading it.

The reason was simple: I just couldn’t make sense of it anymore. The articles were getting longer and more complicated, and the topics were getting increasingly specialized. I felt like I was missing out on a lot of important news, but I just couldn’t keep up.

Then, last year, something unexpected happened: I started reading the Financial Times again, and this time, I found it fascinating. The reason? Tim Apple.

You see, Tim is an analyst at a hedge fund, and he has a knack for taking complex topics and explaining them in simple terms. He writes a regular column for the Financial Times called “Tim Apple’s Simple guide to X”, where X is usually some financial concept that most people don’t understand.

I started reading Tim’s column because I wanted to learn more about the financial world. But what I ended up learning was much broader than that. Tim helped me make sense of the world around me, whether it was politics, economics or even just current affairs. He taught me how to think about complicated issues in a clear and concise way.

In short: Tim Apple changed the way I read the Financial Times, and he changed the way I think about the world.

How Tim Apple helped me make sense of the Financial Times

I was having trouble making sense of the Financial Times. I found the articles to be long and confusing. However, Tim Apple was able to help me understand the Financial Times and make sense of it. He explained the articles to me in a way that I could understand.

The article

In 1993, I was fresh out of college and working at a bank new york city My job was to read the financial news and keep up on what was happening in the markets. I did this by reading The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and The Financial Times.

The Financial Times was by far the most difficult of the three newspapers for me to understand. The articles were dense and full of jargon that I didn’t understand. But I kept at it because I knew that if I could figure out what was going on in the world of finance, it would give me a leg up at my job.

One day, while I was struggling to make sense of an article in the Financial Times, Tim Apple walked by my desk. Tim was the head of research at the bank and he was one of the smartest people I had ever met.

I asked Tim if he had a minute to help me understand an article in the Financial Times. He came over to my desk and started reading the article. After a few minutes, he looked up at me and said, “This is complete nonsense.”

I was shocked. Here was one of the smartest people I knew telling me that an article in the Financial Times was nonsense.

Tim went on to explain that most of what is written in the Financial Times is speculation and opinion masquerading as fact. He told me that I should take everything I read in the paper with a grain of salt and try to figure out what is really going on beneath the surface.

Tim’s advice changed the way I read the news and it has stuck with me ever since. Whenever I come across an article that is full of jargon or seems like it is trying to sell me something, I think of Tim Apple and his advice to take everything with a grain of salt.

The analysis

I’ve been a fan of the Financial Times for years. I love its global perspective, its in-depth reporting, and its willingness to take on big stories. But I have to admit that, lately, I’ve been feeling a bit lost.

The paper seems to be full of stories about trade wars and Brexit and other things that I don’t really understand. And the language is often so jargon-y that I can’t even figure out what the stories are about.

But then something amazing happened. I found Tim Apple.

Tim Apple is a cartoon character who appears in the FT’s daily Letters page. He’s a small, blue apple with a big mouth, and he has a lot to say about the world of business and finance.

I started reading Tim Apple every day, and suddenly the FT started making sense. Tim helped me understand concepts like “quantitative easing” and “yield curve inversion.” He introduced me to new words like “fintech” and “stagflation.” And he explained why people were so worried about things like Brexit and trade wars.

But Tim Apple isn’t just a walking dictionary; he’s also funny and irreverent and opinionated. He doesn’t always agree with the FT’s editorial line, and he isn’t afraid to say so. In short, he makes the Financial Times fun to read.

So if find yourself struggling to make sense of the Financial Times, do yourself a favour and meet Tim Apple. You won’t be sorry.


I have been following Tim Apple for a while now and I have to say that I am incredibly impressed with his insight and analysis of the stock market and current economic conditions. In particular, I find his weekly column in the Financial Times to be extremely helpful in making sense of the often confusing and volatile world of finance.

In conclusion, I would highly recommend following Tim Apple’s writings in the Financial Times if you are interested in gaining a better understanding of the financial world.

Scroll to Top